To understand the errors of 1968-71, Matinuddin insists we look back to 1947. The "tragedy" began with the geographic absurdity of Pakistan: two wings separated by 1,000 miles of hostile Indian territory.
Pakistan could not change the 1,000-mile gap, but it could have built an equitable federation. The error was treating East Pakistan as a colony, not a partner.
His perspective is unique: a patriotic Pakistani officer who watched his institution and political leadership commit serial blunders. Unlike Western accounts that emphasize Bengali nationalism, or Indian accounts that highlight Islamabad’s brutality, Matinuddin’s "Tragedy of Errors" focuses on . He argues that no single decision led to the fall of Dhaka; rather, it was a cascade of strategic, operational, and tactical errors from 1968 to December 16, 1971.
-extra Quality- Tragedy Of Errors East Pakistan Crisis 1968 1971 Kamal Matinuddin -
To understand the errors of 1968-71, Matinuddin insists we look back to 1947. The "tragedy" began with the geographic absurdity of Pakistan: two wings separated by 1,000 miles of hostile Indian territory.
Pakistan could not change the 1,000-mile gap, but it could have built an equitable federation. The error was treating East Pakistan as a colony, not a partner. To understand the errors of 1968-71, Matinuddin insists
His perspective is unique: a patriotic Pakistani officer who watched his institution and political leadership commit serial blunders. Unlike Western accounts that emphasize Bengali nationalism, or Indian accounts that highlight Islamabad’s brutality, Matinuddin’s "Tragedy of Errors" focuses on . He argues that no single decision led to the fall of Dhaka; rather, it was a cascade of strategic, operational, and tactical errors from 1968 to December 16, 1971. The error was treating East Pakistan as a
