Kienzle V Myers Case Brief !!top!! ✦ Best & High-Quality

In 1981, neighbors Van Duyne and Bauer were legally required to connect to a new public sewer line. To avoid high excavation costs for Bauer, Van Duyne gave Bauer verbal permission to run her sewer pipe through Van Duyne’s property in a shared trench.

During a specific adjustment on , Kienzle experienced immediate and severe pain. She described the sensation as feeling like "something was ripping" in her neck. After this incident, Dr. Myers continued to treat Kienzle for several months, performing additional manipulations in an attempt to alleviate the new, intensified pain. kienzle v myers case brief

To fully understand the legal ruling, one must first visualize the scene. The plaintiff, Mrs. Kienzle, was a social guest (a licensee) at the home of the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Myers. In 1981, neighbors Van Duyne and Bauer were

Kienzle filed her lawsuit against Dr. Myers on , alleging professional negligence (medical malpractice) and lack of informed consent. She described the sensation as feeling like "something