The Srithika collection appears to be a hybrid—some images may be of a real person whose likeness was later altered digitally, while others are wholly fabricated. This ambiguity is precisely what drives the "fake" label.

– Filters like “AI-generated model,” “virtual outfit,” “retouched background,” etc., to browse by how the image was manipulated.

The proliferation of fake images, such as those of Srithika, has significant implications for the fashion industry. For one, it challenges traditional notions of fashion and style, as fake images can create unrealistic expectations and promote unattainable beauty standards. Furthermore, the use of fake images can also perpetuate cultural appropriation and homogenization, as diverse cultural styles and aesthetics are often reduced to a single, monolithic representation.

– Allows users to compare original fashion images with “fake” or edited versions (e.g., AI-generated outfits, altered backgrounds, or virtual styling). This is helpful for detecting digital manipulation.

Unlike the hyper-glamorized and often gaudy results generated by AI, Srithika’s real style is grounded in grace. Her social media profiles and

Also, I want to highlight that, I don't encourage or support any kind of harassment, or creation of explicit content without consent.