The first hour of the film is almost entirely dialogue. The "assault" here is psychological. The captors force Jennifer to listen to audio recordings of the original assault. They mock her trauma. It is torturous not because of physical violence, but because of the repetition of memory.
Zarchi uses the film to directly address the legacy of the original. The "families" seeking revenge represent the decades of criticism that the original film received (exploitation, misogyny, violence as entertainment). By having Jennifer confront them, Zarchi seems to be arguing that the outrage over the original misses the point: Jennifer is a survivor, not a victim. However, the execution is so clumsy it undermines this. i spit on your grave deja vu
In the realm of horror and revenge thrillers, few franchises carry the weight of controversy and visceral intensity quite like I Spit on Your Grave . What began in 1978 with Meir Zarchi’s grimy, exploitation revenge tale evolved into a modern phenomenon with the 2010 remake and its sequels. However, in 2019, the franchise took a meta-textual turn with the release of I Spit on Your Grave: Déjà Vu . The first hour of the film is almost entirely dialogue
In the 1978 film, the audience was asked to grapple with the morality of cheering for Jennifer as she castrated and killed her attackers. It was a simple, brutal equation: rape equals death. Déjà Vu complicates the math. By surviving and killing her tormentors, Jennifer saved herself, but she also sentenced her daughter to a life of looking over her shoulder. They mock her trauma
| Suggerimenti |